1 Descriptive Section

1.1 Indicator category

[1] “Habitat-Physical”

1.2 Indicator name

Warm Core Rings

Includes variable(s): Warm Core Rings

1.3 Indicator brief description

Number of warm core rings produced annually by the Gulf Stream off the Northeast US

1.4 Indicator visualization

Prior to 2000, an average of 18 warm core rings were formed by the Gulf Stream off the Northeast US shelf. From 2000-2017, an average of 33 warm core rings were formed. Annual numbers of warm core rings have been updated using the same methods for each year since 2017, but the regime shift analysis has not been updated.

2 SMART Attribute Section

2.1 Indicator documentation

2.1.1 Are indicators available for others to use (data downloadable)?

Yes

2.1.1.2 How often are they updated? Are future updates likely?

[need sequential look at datasets for update frequency. Future requires judgement]

2.1.1.3 Who is the contact?

Avijit Gangopadhyay

2.1.2 Gather indicator statistics

2.1.2.1 Units

Indicator

Units

Warm Core Rings

n

2.1.2.2 Length of time series, start and end date, periodicity

General overview: Annual

Indicator specifics:

Indicator

EPU

StartYear

EndYear

NumYears

MissingYears

Warm Core Rings

All

1980

2024

45

0

2.1.2.3 Spatial location, scale and extent

General overview: Full shelf

Indicator specifics:

Indicator

EPU

Warm Core Rings

All

2.1.2.4 Management scale: all species, FMP level, species level, can it be aggregated or separated to different scales?

[Classify by hand, note gridded data if available could be applied to different species ranges]

2.1.2.5 Uncertainty metrics

Uncertainty is captured in these variables:

character(0)

2.1.3 Are methods clearly documented to obtain source data and calculate indicators?

Yes

2.1.3.1 Can the indicator be calculated from current documentation?

The data from Gangopadhyay et al. (2019) were provided by Avijit Gangopandhyay, School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, MA.

A sequential regime shift detection algorithm was used to identify the regimes evident in the warm core ring formation time-series. See Gangopadhyay et al. (2019) for details.

2.1.3.2 Is code publicly available? up to date?

No

2.1.3.3 Have methods changed over time?

No

2.1.4 Are indicator underlying source data linked or easy to find?

Data is available upon request.

2.1.4.1 Where are source data stored?

Gulf Stream charts from Jennifer Clark are the primary data source for the warm core ring analysis in Gangopadhyay et al. (2019). The Gulf Stream charts use infra-red (IR) imagery, satellite altimetry data, and surface in-situ temperature data in 3-day composite images are regularly produced by NOAA and/or the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (fermi) group (see http://fermi.jhuapl.edu for more details).

2.1.4.2 How/by whom are source data updated? Are future updates likely?

Avijit Gangopadhyay

[likelihood of source data updates requires judgement, enter by hand]

2.1.4.3 How often are they updated?

[Update by hand, look for source, may require judgement]

2.2 Indicator analysis/testing or history of use

2.2.1 What decision or advice processes are the indicators currently used in?

Warm core rings are eddies formed from Gulf Stream meanders that transport warm Gulf Stream water into the cooler waters of the slope sea just off the Northeast US continental shelf. These rings transport both warm water and associated plankton and fish from the Gulf Stream towards the shelf and may form important habitat for oceanic fishery species, such as Illex squid. The indicator presented here extends published work [91]; with updated counts of warm core rings.

2.2.2 What implications of the indicators are currently listed?

The increased instability of the Gulf Stream position and warming of the Slope Sea may be connected to the regime shift increase in the number of warm core rings formed annually in the Northwest Atlantic [91,92]. When warm core rings and eddies interact with the continental slope they can transport warm, salty water to the continental shelf [93], which can alter the habitat and disrupt seasonal movements of fish [94]. Transport of offshore water onto the shelf is happening more frequently [94,95] and can contribute to marine heatwaves in the Mid-Atlantic Bight [93,96] as well as the movement of shelf-break species inshore [94,97,98].

2.2.3 Do target, limit, or threshold values already exist for the indicator?

No

2.2.4 Have the indicators been tested to ensure they respond proportionally to a change in the underlying process?

No

2.2.5 Are the indicators sensitive to a small change in the process, or what is the threshold of change that is detectable?

Sensitivity terms detected

2.2.6 Is there a time lag between the process change and the indicator change? How long?

Unknown

3 SMART rating

Category

Indicator

Element

Attribute

Rating

ElementRating

OverallRating

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Described

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Units

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Spatial

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Uncertainty

0

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Methods

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Specific

Code

0

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

Available

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

Online

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

Contact

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

SourceDat

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

SourceAvail

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Measurable

SourceContact

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Achievable

Tested

0

0.3333333

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Achievable

Sensitivity

1

0.3333333

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Achievable

TimeLag

0

0.3333333

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Relevant

Advice

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Relevant

Implications

1

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Relevant

TargThresh

0

0.6666667

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Timebound

Frequency

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

Habitat-Physical

Warm Core Rings

Timebound

Updated

1

1.0000000

0.7333333

3.1 Comments

[Fill below by hand once above data complete]

3.1.2 What additional work would be needed for the Council to use the indicator?

3.1.3 What issues are caused if there is a gap or delay in data underlying the indicator