1 Descriptive Section

1.1 Indicator category

[1] “Fishery”

1.2 Indicator name

Recreational HMS

Includes variable(s): LargeCoastal-MAB, LargeCoastal-NE, Prohibited-MAB, Prohibited-NE, SmallCoastal-MAB, SmallCoastal-NE

1.3 Indicator brief description

Recreational shark landings pulled from the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP).

1.4 Indicator visualization

Recreational landings of sharks are plotted. Sharks are categorized as large coastal, prohibited and small coastal.

## Error in optim(par = rho, fn = likelihood_ar1, gr = NULL, data, hypothesis,  : 
##   L-BFGS-B needs finite values of 'fn'

2 SMART Attribute Section

2.1 Indicator documentation

2.1.1 Are indicators available for others to use (data downloadable)?

Yes

2.1.1.2 How often are they updated? Are future updates likely?

[need sequential look at datasets for update frequency. Future requires judgement]

2.1.1.3 Who is the contact?

Brandon Beltz ()

2.1.2 Gather indicator statistics

2.1.2.1 Units

Indicator

Units

LargeCoastal-MAB

no Units field

LargeCoastal-NE

no Units field

Prohibited-MAB

no Units field

Prohibited-NE

no Units field

SmallCoastal-MAB

no Units field

SmallCoastal-NE

no Units field

2.1.2.2 Length of time series, start and end date, periodicity

General overview: annually from 1981 to 2022

Indicator specifics:

Indicator

EPU

StartYear

EndYear

NumYears

MissingYears

LargeCoastal-MAB

MAB

1981

2022

42

0

LargeCoastal-NE

NE

1981

2022

34

8

Prohibited-MAB

MAB

1981

2022

42

0

Prohibited-NE

NE

1981

2022

19

23

SmallCoastal-MAB

MAB

1982

2022

25

16

SmallCoastal-NE

NE

2019

2019

1

0

2.1.2.3 Spatial location, scale and extent

General overview: by EPU

Indicator specifics:

Indicator

EPU

LargeCoastal-MAB

MAB

LargeCoastal-NE

NE

Prohibited-MAB

MAB

Prohibited-NE

NE

SmallCoastal-MAB

MAB

SmallCoastal-NE

NE

2.1.2.4 Management scale: all species, FMP level, species level, can it be aggregated or separated to different scales?

[Classify by hand, note gridded data if available could be applied to different species ranges]

2.1.2.5 Uncertainty metrics

Uncertainty is captured in these variables:

character(0)

2.1.3 Are methods clearly documented to obtain source data and calculate indicators?

Yes

2.1.3.1 Can the indicator be calculated from current documentation?

Data regions “4 = New England” and “5 = Mid-Atlantic” were selected for to remove data from regions not relevant to the State of the Ecosystem reports. The data were then grouped into categories using the table below. This species list was the list used in the above “species” section in the MRIP query. Data were grouped by year, category and region, and the sum of all the landings for each was used as the indicator for recreational shark harvest.

2.1.3.2 Is code publicly available? up to date?

No

2.1.3.3 Have methods changed over time?

No

2.1.4 Are indicator underlying source data linked or easy to find?

Data sets are publicly available (see Data Sources below).

2.1.4.1 Where are source data stored?

All recreational shark fishing indicator data were downloaded from the Marine Recreational Information Program MRIP Recreational Fisheries Statistics Queries portal. From the main Recreational fisheries statistics queries page, the download query link is available. From here the following selections made include: The ZIP file was used in the following analysis.

2.1.4.2 How/by whom are source data updated? Are future updates likely?

Kimberly Bastille,

[likelihood of source data updates requires judgement, enter by hand]

2.1.4.3 How often are they updated?

[Update by hand, look for source, may require judgement]

2.2 Indicator analysis/testing or history of use

2.2.1 What decision or advice processes are the indicators currently used in?

Recreational shark landings pulled from the MRIP database

2.2.2 What implications of the indicators are currently listed?

Sharks are landed recreationally in quantities that are relevant to fisheries management. These landings should be considered when assessing the populations of sharks.

2.2.3 Do target, limit, or threshold values already exist for the indicator?

No

2.2.4 Have the indicators been tested to ensure they respond proportionally to a change in the underlying process?

No

2.2.5 Are the indicators sensitive to a small change in the process, or what is the threshold of change that is detectable?

Unknown

2.2.6 Is there a time lag between the process change and the indicator change? How long?

Unknown

3 SMART rating

Category

Indicator

Element

Attribute

Rating

ElementRating

OverallRating

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Described

1.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Units

0.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Spatial

1.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Uncertainty

0.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Methods

1.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Specific

Code

0.0

0.5000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

Available

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

Online

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

Contact

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

SourceDat

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

SourceAvail

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Measurable

SourceContact

1.0

1.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Achievable

Tested

0.0

0.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Achievable

Sensitivity

0.0

0.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Achievable

TimeLag

0.0

0.0000000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Relevant

Advice

1.0

0.6666667

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Relevant

Implications

1.0

0.6666667

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Relevant

TargThresh

0.0

0.6666667

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Timebound

Frequency

1.0

0.7500000

0.5833333

Fishery

Recreational HMS

Timebound

Updated

0.5

0.7500000

0.5833333

3.1 Comments

[Fill below by hand once above data complete]

3.1.2 What additional work would be needed for the Council to use the indicator?

3.1.3 What issues are caused if there is a gap or delay in data underlying the indicator